If this was made already, i just killed it. jk.
So, which pokemon do you think didn't need to be created? i say Pikachu.
Accuslly, i dont think cressailea or heatran were needed. or dunsparce, or pinaco.
Mainly...
All of them, how many kids wouldn't be overweight if they were not created...oh dreams
Especially, I hate Mudkip.
^ Beat me to it.
I'd say Raichu. The intended audience of Pokemon games, ages eight to twelve, will not evolve their precious Pikachu. Ever.
RanDumb Wrote:Mainly...
All of them, how many kids wouldn't be overweight if they were not created...oh dreams
Especially, I hate Mudkip.
Meh, Yah. but, hey, its really hard to be addicted to it. i just do it to- do you know what? i ont even know why. weird.
Did you say you hate mudkip just to annoy me? probably. You know, this is pointless pokemon, not ones you hate. mudkip was needed to be a starter.
heh, i remember, i was like 6, and i evolved my pikachu, and i was so mad at myself. now, i dont even care.
Phione and rhotom werent needed.
Sableye. :|
Though it may be weak to nothing, it's a weak pokemon.. and... I think it's pointless. >_>
Magikarp obviously, yeah raichu i have raichu buti don't even use it i remember being annoyed at not being able to use a thunderstone on my ******* pickachu in yellow version yeah dunsparce, OH YES Sableye is USELESS -underlines twice- meh i use foretress (or h/e you spell it) but not pineco, i never use lower evo's, i think Qwilfish what do you do with it seriously >.> no evolution and the type mix was used before, hmmm you know what let me start my game for this oh uber legendaries i like to look at em and have em as much as the next guy but they are unfair in battle and basically have no other use but to be looked at, Pichu just useless like the rest of it's evolutionary branch, Manaphy and phione are just really useless imo, hmmm i think that covers it for me i have more but they are so deeply immersed in my opinion that i would rather not share them and have you all gasp XD..., oh what the heck all lower evo's no point for me i don't use them i let them evolve, using a lower form is pointless when they are at a high level, when the evoluitons stats are better why use the crappier version? so yes to me lower evo's are pretty useless, don't try and get me out of that one either..., yeah ok i think i'm good now :] XD
I know what you're gonna say about the lower evo thing just save it (not to be rude) they feel pointless to me in battle they have uses but i'm most interested in battling so if they aren't the best i could possibly have in battle then they are pointless to me
If any of them were pointless, what would be the point of "Gotta Catch 'Em All" if you cut out all the "pointless" Pokémon? You'd have about 5 left.
If you read the black text it says they are pointless to me in battle, the thread is after all which pokemon do you THINK didn't need to be created so it's opinion, and like i said i mean that in the perspective of battling not catching and not the game outside of battling get me?, btw i also said i knew what everyone was gonna say already, so i knew this was coming but like i said i mean BATTLE wise ONLY, quite sorry if not even my edit made that clear and why question my opinion? i know there would be very little left but to me the game is straight up about battling not catching, so please do take my perspective into view when you question my opinion and i did add i only think this battle wise only
(Please do forgive me if i sounded rude i do not mean it in an aggressive manner)
Skitty, I really don't like that thing. And Sesh magicarp is awesome, it evolves into gyrados. =P
Yeah but magikarp isn't very good i mean imagine you play yellow and they onyl have Gyrados and you catch it and it's great, then next version they introduce magikarp and it evolves at level 20 naturally it's a ***** to train cause it's stats are terrible and so is it's move pool, pretty much tackle and splash and yeah i have to agree Skittys nothing special